June 2024
Apple Music v. Spotify
Intro
The age-old question many people ask is: where should I listen to my music? There are countless answers: illegally downloading MP3s and transferring them to an iPod, using free platforms like YouTube or SoundCloud, or for most people, subscribing to an audio streaming service.
The two most popular contenders in this field are Spotify or Apple Music. The real question is: which one is "better"? While both platforms stream music, each has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this entry, I'll explore some key factors I personally look at when comparing these streaming services.
The two most popular contenders in this field are Spotify or Apple Music. The real question is: which one is "better"? While both platforms stream music, each has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this entry, I'll explore some key factors I personally look at when comparing these streaming services.
Pricing
The first thing most people consider when buying anything is the price. Streaming services don't shy away from this—subscriptions are everywhere nowadays. But which ones are worth it? For music streaming, Apple Music charges $5.99 per month for students, $10.99 for personal use, and $16.99 for families. Recently, Spotify updated their prices to $11.99 for personal and $19.99 for families, while their student plan remains at $5.99, same as Apple's.
With Spotify's new prices reflecting this year, I have seen a huge influx of comparisons of the two platforms. Apple Music now is cheaper and offers more features on paper. After using both services for about two months, I figured I would make a writing entry that compares the two from my perspective. TL;DR, I have used Spotify for about 4 years now but am leaning towards Apple Music.
With Spotify's new prices reflecting this year, I have seen a huge influx of comparisons of the two platforms. Apple Music now is cheaper and offers more features on paper. After using both services for about two months, I figured I would make a writing entry that compares the two from my perspective. TL;DR, I have used Spotify for about 4 years now but am leaning towards Apple Music.
Interface
From a Product Designer perspective [me] who values simplicity, intuitiveness, and ease of use, Apple Music’s mobile interface better displays these. Apple's design hides unnecessary clutter like Share buttons, a large lyrics drawer, and the "like button" within a collapsible menu. While others may find these features useful, they contribute to clutter that I personally don't use often enough to justify their prominent placement on Spotify's interface.
Spotify seems to adopt a "more is better" approach, whereas I believe in "less is more" when it comes to interface design. Below is a diagram illustrating the layers of the Apple interface.
Spotify seems to adopt a "more is better" approach, whereas I believe in "less is more" when it comes to interface design. Below is a diagram illustrating the layers of the Apple interface.
One interface that stands miles apart is the lyrics view. On the left is Spotify's view, and on the right is Apple Music's view, for both mobile and desktop. The guided lyrics (where Apple excels far beyond Spotify) is an aspect I'll talk about in more detail in the Lyrics section down below.
Guided Lyrics (Mobile Experience)
Guided Lyrics (Desktop Experience)
Viewing Angle
Both streaming services offer a full-screen guided lyrics viewing experience on desktop, but Apple Music emerges as the winner in this aspect. Spotify clutters the information towards the top left of the screen, shrinking the album artwork cover significantly.
Moreover, Spotify removes the controls and audio slider, leaving users unaware of the song's remaining time or their current position within it. To access these details, users must move the mouse to make them appear.
I also find Spotify's guided lyrics confusing because as previous lyrics scroll out of view, they remain white, similar to the current lyrics. The upcoming lyrics are grey until it's their turn, leading to confusion about the singer's current position in the lyrics. In contrast, Apple Music improves clarity by blurring upcoming lyrics and highlighting only the lyrics currently being sung.
Moreover, Spotify removes the controls and audio slider, leaving users unaware of the song's remaining time or their current position within it. To access these details, users must move the mouse to make them appear.
I also find Spotify's guided lyrics confusing because as previous lyrics scroll out of view, they remain white, similar to the current lyrics. The upcoming lyrics are grey until it's their turn, leading to confusion about the singer's current position in the lyrics. In contrast, Apple Music improves clarity by blurring upcoming lyrics and highlighting only the lyrics currently being sung.
Apple Music excels in keeping information centered on the screen, ensuring the user's focus remains at the center with all essential details within a short viewing angle. A beautifully large album artwork cover complements the guided lyrics positioned on the right side. This layout appeals to me more than Spotify's approach.
Queue
This is one aspect of Apple Music that I dislike and prefer the Spotify approach to adding songs to the queue. In Apple Music, when you add songs to the queue, they stack on top of each other. For instance, if you initially queued 4 songs (as shown in the diagram below), and then add a 5th song, it will play next, pushing the previously queued songs down. This stacking behavior becomes extensive if you have a long list of queued songs or want to maintain the order in which you added them. To keep songs in the order you queued them, you have to add them backwards, which can be counterintuitive.
Additionally, when sliding a song over to add it to the queue, Apple Music presents two hidden options: add next or add later, which adds an extra step to the process. This approach offers flexibility to choose whether to add the song immediately or later. But 99% of the time in my experience, I typically want to queue a song to add it to the end of the list, not in front of everything.
Additionally, when sliding a song over to add it to the queue, Apple Music presents two hidden options: add next or add later, which adds an extra step to the process. This approach offers flexibility to choose whether to add the song immediately or later. But 99% of the time in my experience, I typically want to queue a song to add it to the end of the list, not in front of everything.
Queue Add
Spotify's approach adds a song to the queue automatically placing it at the end of the previously added songs. Alternatively, you can press the three dots and choose "add to later." While this isn't a deal breaker, I just find myself adding songs to the queue to place them at the end of the list. Therefore, Spotify's system better suits my personal preferences and needs.
Queue Add
Lyrics
As mentioned earlier, I greatly prefer the lyrics experience offered by Apple Music, especially their guided lyrics feature. One standout aspect is how Apple Music highlights the current lyrics. Spotify lights up the entire line when the singer reaches that part of the song, whereas Apple Music highlights specific words and even letters that the artist is currently singing.
This dynamic highlighting adjusts in real-time: when a singer holds a note longer, the scrolling speed slows down to match the singer's voice, improving the experience. Personally, this feature makes me feel like I'm experiencing a live performance, as the variable scrolling mimics the artist's cadence and expression.
It's a bit less noticeable on fast-paced songs, but in slower tracks like the one from Sky Ferreira that I included, where she holds the ending words of the lines for longer, it's much easier to notice.
This dynamic highlighting adjusts in real-time: when a singer holds a note longer, the scrolling speed slows down to match the singer's voice, improving the experience. Personally, this feature makes me feel like I'm experiencing a live performance, as the variable scrolling mimics the artist's cadence and expression.
It's a bit less noticeable on fast-paced songs, but in slower tracks like the one from Sky Ferreira that I included, where she holds the ending words of the lines for longer, it's much easier to notice.
Long Note Example
This lyrics diagram highlights Apple Music's guided lyrics experience. Upcoming lyrics are subtly greyed out and progressively blurred, adjusting to their position in the song. Meanwhile, the current lyrics are brightly highlighted, providing a clear indication of each breath, note, and line the artist is performing.
Lyrics Breakdown
Apple uses a progressive blur on their lyrics, which blur out the lyrics in different amounts, variably. These diagrams below provide a great visualization of this (Diagram 1 and 2). This is a Figma plugin and was created by Anh.
Diagram 1
Diagram 2
Algorithim
This section will be brief as I don't have detailed diagrams to illustrate the complex process of creating personalized music experiences for millions of users. However, I will say that in my opinion, Spotify's algorithm is superior. Spotify consistently recommends more music that aligns with my tastes through playlists.
While Apple Music also offers personalized recommendations and playlists, I find that I like the suggested music at a rate of about 17%, whereas with Spotify, it's around 23%. (lol)
While Apple Music also offers personalized recommendations and playlists, I find that I like the suggested music at a rate of about 17%, whereas with Spotify, it's around 23%. (lol)
Compression
Spotify lags behind in the realm of "lossless" streaming, where platforms like Tidal and Apple Music offer lossless audio. Apple Music even goes further by streaming some songs in Dolby Atmos, an audio codec that positions instruments within a 3-dimensional space (as shown below). This enhances the listening experience significantly.
But Dolby Atmos is super expensive, making it accessible mainly to major artists with substantial budgets. Smaller artists on tighter budgets can't afford this technology, and sometimes Apple's attempt to apply Dolby effects to songs can result in odd sound quality.
Currently, Spotify only offers streaming at 320kbps. While this aspect doesn't heavily sway my opinion, audio enthusiasts and those familiar with sound quality often prefer lossless files for a superior listening experience.
But Dolby Atmos is super expensive, making it accessible mainly to major artists with substantial budgets. Smaller artists on tighter budgets can't afford this technology, and sometimes Apple's attempt to apply Dolby effects to songs can result in odd sound quality.
Currently, Spotify only offers streaming at 320kbps. While this aspect doesn't heavily sway my opinion, audio enthusiasts and those familiar with sound quality often prefer lossless files for a superior listening experience.
Dolby Atmos Software
Conclusion
At the end of the day, both platforms serve the basic function of streaming music. (obviously)
However, it's the finer details within the experience that can sway someone towards one platform over the other. For me, Apple Music stands out. Many of the features I've highlighted are crucial to my enjoyment, and I find their implementation on Apple Music to offer a superior experience.
Plus, currently, it's cheaper too—unless Apple decides to adjust their prices in response to Spotify.
However, it's the finer details within the experience that can sway someone towards one platform over the other. For me, Apple Music stands out. Many of the features I've highlighted are crucial to my enjoyment, and I find their implementation on Apple Music to offer a superior experience.
Plus, currently, it's cheaper too—unless Apple decides to adjust their prices in response to Spotify.